Hi Barry,
This does sound like a nice mode. Could be a good lisp project for me to
get started on (I’ve been toying with the virtues of the Acme editor but
emacs is too convenient or ATS, so I find myself still using it). By the
way, you’ve mentioned guile previously, so I’m curious if you use the Emacs
fork that uses Guile/scheme in place of elisp?On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Barry Schwartz < chemoe...@chemoelectric.org> wrote:
I’d kind of like to have an adaptation of Emacs tuareg-mode for
ATS.Just saying. (Hint. Hint.)
Not the running-OCaml-top-level parts, of course, and I always run my
compiler from a shell instead of from Emacs. But I’d like it for
editing – and as a visible structural check. I’ve found elusive
coding bugs that slipped past typechecking, by reformatting OCaml in
tuareg-mode and seeing that the indentation came out wrong.(That’s one reason why I abhor indentation-sensitive syntax of
Python’s kind.)–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
“ats-lang-users” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ats-lang-user...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to ats-lan...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ats-lang-users.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ats-lang-users/20141023182249.GA7366%40crud
.
Brandon Barker
brandon...@gmail.com